Every year, I watch (or at least try to watch) the Oscars live.
For the second time, I’m in the Netherlands when they take place so I can’t watch it on TV. I’ll try online to see if I’m right about my bets.
See my bets below:
Best actress in a supporting role
Nominees:
Bérénice Bejo, The Artist
Jessica Chastain, The Help
Melissa McCarthy, Bridesmaids
Janet McTeer, Albert Nobbs
Octavia Spencer, The Help
I only saw two of three of the actresses mentioned. Bérénice Bejo is in a leading role. So it’s a bit unfair to have nominated in this category. I absolutely loved her performance. In a silent movie expression is everything, and she has it all. And she dances wonderfully. It was also wonderful to see Jessica Chastain in the opposite pole from her performance in The tree of life. But it’s a bit of a goofy character and I would say that the academy is reluctant in awarding that.
Octavia Spencer only has a chance if the oscar for the actress in a leading role would go for Viola Davis. Not sure what will happen there.
My pick: Bérénice Bejo
Best actor in a supporting role
Nominees:
Kenneth Branagh, My Week with Marilyn
Jonah Hill, Moneyball
Nick Nolte, Warrior
Christopher Plummer, Beginners
Max von Sydow, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
Not a lot of information here. I’ve seen two and a half performances. From what I saw, Christopher Plummer is the best. But I have only seen a bit of “Extremely loud...” where Max von Sydow appears.
I haven’t seen Kenneth Branagah nor Nick Nolte. Kenneth Branagah is always a safe choice. But Holywood loves a comeback so Nick Nolte might have a shot. On the other hand, he’s a bit anti-establishment and the academy is revengeful
Jonah Hill is great but there is a trail for the Oscar. This year he’ll only get the nod.
My pick: Kenneth Branagah
Best actress in a leading role
Nominees:
Glenn Close, Albert Nobbs
Viola Davis, The Help
Rooney Mara, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady
Michelle Williams, My Week with Marilyn
I haven’t seen Glenn Close’s performance so I might be really off here. Form the ones I’ve seen, I would say it’s a good tie between Meryl and Viola. But it’s unfair for Meryl. First, she’s portraying someone so it’s always more difficult because we have a term for comparison. Viola Davis just has to be intense in whatever style she wants. Besides, the academy always puts the bar higher for Meryl. She has like 13 or 14 nominations and “only” two wins. To give the third oscar is something huge. It’s totally deserved but the academy is always expecting more from her.
But in any case...
My pick: Meryl Streep
Best actor in a leading role
Nominees:
Demián Bichir, A Better Life
George Clooney, The Descendants
Jean Dujardin, The Artist
Gary Oldman, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
Brad Pitt, Moneyball
Only saw three of them. Too bad i haven’t seen Gary Oldman. I want to. He’s one of my favorite actors (some other favorites by the way: Sean Penn, Daniel Day Lewis, Tim Roth...)
From what I saw, Jean Dujardin would be the fair choice. Clooney is really well in this one but two oscars given to such a good looking guy is too much. Brad Pitt is wonderful in general but not spectacularly here. And he also suffers from Clooney’s disease.
My pick: Jean Dujardin
Best director
Nominees:
Michel Hazavanicius, The Artist
Alexander Payne, The Descendants
Martin Scorsese, Hugo
Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris
Terrence Malick, The Tree of Life
It would be really strange to give Martin Scorcese an Oscar for something so far from his style especially given that i can count at least three times when he should have been given an Oscar and didn’t get it.
I love Terrence Malick’s direction. But a lot of the good vibes coming from the tree of life comes from the cinematography and editing.
Michel Hazavanicius also has a shot. But it’s very hard to imagine how the academy is going to react to The artist.
My pick: Michel Hazavanicius
Best original Screenplay
Nominees:
The Artist
Bridesmaids
Margin Call
Midnight in Paris
A Separation
Don’t know enough here. The Artist doesn’t deserve it. And I haven’t seen the rest.
A Separation will win for best foreign movie so I wouldn’t bet on that one here.
My pick: Midnight in Paris
Best adapted screenplay
Nominees:
The Descendants
Hugo
Ides of March
Moneyball
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
My pick: Hugo
Best foreign language film
Nominees:
Bullhead
Footnote
In Darkness
Monsieur Lazhar
A Separation
My pick: A separation
Best picture
Nominees:
War Horse
The Artist
Moneyball
The Descendants
The Tree of Life
Midnight in Paris
The Help
Hugo
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
I haven’t seen War Horse, Midnight in Paris and Hugo. Midnight in Paris doesn’t have a good shot.
From the 5,5 that I’ve saw, The artist is the best one. But, as I said, it’s really hard to know how the academy is going to react to The Artist. From the others, I would say The Help has the best chance. And it is indeed a great movie. A good mixture of comedy and drama as is common to see in Best Picture Oscar winners. But I’m putting all my eggs in the Artist basket.
My pick: The Artist
Art direction
Nominees:
The Artist
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2
Hugo
Midnight in Paris
War Horse
My pick: Hugo
Cinematography
Nominees:
The Artist
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Hugo
The Tree of Life
War Horse
The tree of life was received with both great and awful reviews. But in one thing people agree. It’s a great cinematography.
My pick: The tree of life
Film editing
Nominees:
The Artist
The Descendants
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Hugo
Moneyball
My pick: Hugo
Visual effects
Nominees:
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2
Hugo
Real Steel
Rise of the Planet of the Apes
Transformers: Dark of the Moon
I haven’t seen none. But I think the Rise of the Planet Apes has good chances here. But if Hugo doesn’t win any of the most important oscars it will win this one.
Make up
Nominees:
Albert Nobbs
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2
The Iron Lady
My pick: the Iron Lady
domingo, 26 de fevereiro de 2012
quarta-feira, 2 de novembro de 2011
Artist #5: Self
Apparently this is not new. But it was thanks to a Weeds episode last night that finishes with this song that I got to know this band. Self is a band producing alternative pop rock music. Matt Mahaffey is basically the creator behind the whole thing. He's the writer, singer, producer, etc. He was already producing for hip hop artists while still in high school. He has a vast knowledge of music that allows him to produce songs combining many differnet styles, within the same song. Below it's just one wonderful illustration. Listen to it and notice how it varies so nicely. Lyrics however are repetitive!
quinta-feira, 15 de setembro de 2011
quinta-feira, 4 de agosto de 2011
Movie #22 - Super 8
It was great fun to be in the movies the other day. For two hours, I felt the same way as I did during a summer in the early 90’s a cultural centre near my place did a retrospective of the “oeuvre” of Steven Spielberg. During that summer I saw at least 12 movies of Steven Spielberg and only a few days ago I realized how that summer was so determining in making me love the movies the way I do nowadays.
And why did I feel like that? Because I was watching Super 8, and the entire time I felt like I was watching a Steven Spielberg’s movie. In fact, it’s the new JJ Abrams movie (the guy from Lost, Star Trek, Alias, etc) but Spielberg produced it and apparently he was on set often and for long periods.
Below I can describe how much this movie resembles other Spielberg movies, but specially ET, but for now just a couple of lines to say why it is worth watching. Well, first, if you like typical Spielberg movies you’ll like this one. Second, and as in all the movies I enjoy particularly, the acting is amazing. It’s even more incredible because the performances here are provided by kids. Ellen Fanning demonstrates us that the talent was equally distributed in the family and it’s not just Dakota (the girl from I am Sam) who got the talent. The kid is also brilliant but I don’t recall seeing him in other movies. He does remind me of someone but I still can’t say who it is. And the rest of the kids are all great. It’s all rich characters and that doesn’t happen often with kids. And finally, the story is exciting. You don’t know anything at the beginning and you gather bits and pieces of information along the way.
There were a few things I did not like in the movie (some clichés, some sentimental crap, some gaffes) but all minor details drowned in the sea of excitement that I felt when watching the And now SPOILERS down below.
The major critic I could have for this movie is how much it resembles ET. At some points, it seems like a remake.
Here is a list of similarities between the two movies:
1) An alien arrives to the Earth
2) A group of kids contacts with this alien
3) Within this group of kids, the one that is most shy is the one who will relate more to the alien and is the one who in the end will be the bravest.
4) The group of kids tries to save the alien by helping him return home
5) There are bicycles flying because of the alien, even though this time the kids are not on top of those bicycles.
And then, there are other aspects that are very “Spielbergian” even if it’s from other movies. On the one hand, the whole adventurous spirit of the kids reminds me of The Goonies and the complicated father-son relationship is a typical feature in almost all Spielberg movies.
Despite of all these similarities, or maybe because of these, it is definitely a film worth watching that feeds the thirst for Blockbusters that always emerges in the summer but also feeds on my constant will to watch good movies. And this is a good movie!
And why did I feel like that? Because I was watching Super 8, and the entire time I felt like I was watching a Steven Spielberg’s movie. In fact, it’s the new JJ Abrams movie (the guy from Lost, Star Trek, Alias, etc) but Spielberg produced it and apparently he was on set often and for long periods.
Below I can describe how much this movie resembles other Spielberg movies, but specially ET, but for now just a couple of lines to say why it is worth watching. Well, first, if you like typical Spielberg movies you’ll like this one. Second, and as in all the movies I enjoy particularly, the acting is amazing. It’s even more incredible because the performances here are provided by kids. Ellen Fanning demonstrates us that the talent was equally distributed in the family and it’s not just Dakota (the girl from I am Sam) who got the talent. The kid is also brilliant but I don’t recall seeing him in other movies. He does remind me of someone but I still can’t say who it is. And the rest of the kids are all great. It’s all rich characters and that doesn’t happen often with kids. And finally, the story is exciting. You don’t know anything at the beginning and you gather bits and pieces of information along the way.
There were a few things I did not like in the movie (some clichés, some sentimental crap, some gaffes) but all minor details drowned in the sea of excitement that I felt when watching the And now SPOILERS down below.
The major critic I could have for this movie is how much it resembles ET. At some points, it seems like a remake.
Here is a list of similarities between the two movies:
1) An alien arrives to the Earth
2) A group of kids contacts with this alien
3) Within this group of kids, the one that is most shy is the one who will relate more to the alien and is the one who in the end will be the bravest.
4) The group of kids tries to save the alien by helping him return home
5) There are bicycles flying because of the alien, even though this time the kids are not on top of those bicycles.
And then, there are other aspects that are very “Spielbergian” even if it’s from other movies. On the one hand, the whole adventurous spirit of the kids reminds me of The Goonies and the complicated father-son relationship is a typical feature in almost all Spielberg movies.
Despite of all these similarities, or maybe because of these, it is definitely a film worth watching that feeds the thirst for Blockbusters that always emerges in the summer but also feeds on my constant will to watch good movies. And this is a good movie!
segunda-feira, 4 de julho de 2011
Sushi by Tupperware
If this is a blog about things I enjoy during the course of my postdoc, then it would be a matter of time until sushi got his mention. And this is the perfect opportunity as yesterday I bought the perfect instrument for those who sometimes struggle to make the makis and the nigiris. Apparently Tupperware is not stuck in time and has given proofs of adapting to the future. Check out in the video what I just bought yesterday. I bought the orange instruments. The tupperware for making the rice wasn't necessary as I already do it in the magic kitchen machine called Bimby.
segunda-feira, 27 de junho de 2011
Wine #10 - Casa Santa Vitória 2008 @Tasca da Esquina
The other day we went to Tasca da Esquina, a kind of recent place that was taken by one the most famous Portuguese Chefs (Vitor Sobral). His idea was to make a comfortable, nice and affordable place to eat informal food. We had the 4-course dinner and it was amazing at a very reasonable price. It's in Campo de Ourique and I strongly recommend to anyone living in or visiting Lisbon, But I'm mentioning this restaurant mostly because during this dinner, I had the chance to taste a wonderful wine, again at a very reasonable price. The wine is Casa Santa Vitória 2008. At the wine shops, this wine is sold at less than 5 Eur. It's from Alentejo, with an incredible smell and a very dark colour. You can consult some tasting notes (in portuguese) here.
quinta-feira, 2 de junho de 2011
Movie #21 - The tree of life
It is a bit hard to talk about this movie. First, I need to mention that in the session I was in, there was some kind of problem with the copy that was being projected in terms of editing. It seemed to be a mix of two different films: one was a documentary for National Geographic and the other one was Terence Malick's movie and these two got mixed during editing and that editing was made in a Mac, that's why I kept seeing Mac's screensaver at some points in a movie.
Obviously this is just a (bad) joke that I am using to talk about a film that carries some of the most beatiful images I've ever seen on film. When you read about The tree of life there will always be someone mentioning the dinoussaurs and the big sun and the screensavers (sic). But that's not the movie. It's part of it, not pivotal but complementary to the movie. How about the rest of the movie? How was it? It was wonderful. It's not simply the photography that is wonderful and the beatiful photography wasn't just present in those "documentary-kind" portions of the movie. It was always present along with some of the most beatiful pieces of music ever created. It is easy to compare this movie to Kubrick's 2001 A Space Odissey but some of the most fantastic parts in the movie are nothing close to Kubric's style and story types.
Let me illustrate this by explaining how one of my favourite aspects of the movie is simply about the way he films and presents the family. So, the movie follows the life of a young couple as they are about to become parents and follows from birth, the childhood of Jack and his two little brothers. At this point, everyone mentions how these kids are raised by a mother that follows the way of grace and by a father that represents a tougher view of life, closer to Nature's competitive system. But that's one very restrict metaphysical opposition that I felt like a limitation of the movie. What I found incredible in this part of the movie is how it felt like. What it really felt like was that Terence Malick spent a decade with this family and taped most of their moments in everyday life. At the end of this decade, he started editing a film of about an hour about this decade. It's a brilliant work of editing that was only possible by having thousands of hours of filming made before hand.
I could say more about this movie as I think this movie will be part of movie history and as most movies that reach this status, it will be greeted with love and hate to the same extent. But for now, the only thing I feel like being left to say is: You can say whatever you want about the movie but I consider that it is impossible to say that this is not a fantastic piece of work and that's why this movie made the list.
Obviously this is just a (bad) joke that I am using to talk about a film that carries some of the most beatiful images I've ever seen on film. When you read about The tree of life there will always be someone mentioning the dinoussaurs and the big sun and the screensavers (sic). But that's not the movie. It's part of it, not pivotal but complementary to the movie. How about the rest of the movie? How was it? It was wonderful. It's not simply the photography that is wonderful and the beatiful photography wasn't just present in those "documentary-kind" portions of the movie. It was always present along with some of the most beatiful pieces of music ever created. It is easy to compare this movie to Kubrick's 2001 A Space Odissey but some of the most fantastic parts in the movie are nothing close to Kubric's style and story types.
Let me illustrate this by explaining how one of my favourite aspects of the movie is simply about the way he films and presents the family. So, the movie follows the life of a young couple as they are about to become parents and follows from birth, the childhood of Jack and his two little brothers. At this point, everyone mentions how these kids are raised by a mother that follows the way of grace and by a father that represents a tougher view of life, closer to Nature's competitive system. But that's one very restrict metaphysical opposition that I felt like a limitation of the movie. What I found incredible in this part of the movie is how it felt like. What it really felt like was that Terence Malick spent a decade with this family and taped most of their moments in everyday life. At the end of this decade, he started editing a film of about an hour about this decade. It's a brilliant work of editing that was only possible by having thousands of hours of filming made before hand.
I could say more about this movie as I think this movie will be part of movie history and as most movies that reach this status, it will be greeted with love and hate to the same extent. But for now, the only thing I feel like being left to say is: You can say whatever you want about the movie but I consider that it is impossible to say that this is not a fantastic piece of work and that's why this movie made the list.
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)